Stay informed on the latest healthcare news with these hand picked articles from around the web. This is the NueMD Top Five.
In a recent TED Talk on cybercrime, Caleb Barlow remarked that in 2015 alone 100 million people lost their health insurance data to thieves. Despite the growing urgency of ransomware attacks on the healthcare industry, federal funding to prevent cybersecurity threats remains in the thousands, while the cost of these breaches is estimated to be in the millions. Recently, a breach that occurred after a server of the Orleans Medical Clinic was hacked left patient information accessible to thieves for more than 12 days. While the personal information available in health care records remains so lucrative for criminals, it’s up to healthcare providers to stay vigilant in the fight against data loss.
Hospitals produced an estimated 697 million megabytes of data in 2015. That’s more than two megabytes of medical data for every man, woman and child in the United States. And while we may spend billions of dollars and more hours entering data than seeing patients, much of that data remains inaccessible, hidden behind proprietary data architectures, authorizations and patient matching problems.
Imagine you decide to go to the Emergency Department or even an acute care clinic right now. How far would you have to travel, what would you need to bring, what comforts would you leave behind for a harried, hurried trip to a waiting room? And just how much would this trip cost? On the other hand, how long would it take you to set up a FaceTime chat?
For decades, the majority of patients have traveled to an appointment with a physician with one thing in mind: “treatment.” Regardless of the cost or available evidence, most patients trusted physicians with a “you’re-the-doctor” attitude and took whatever medication was prescribed. However, today’s system is rapidly evolving. Patients are now researching their symptoms and diagnoses. Often times they may be overdoing it or relying on inaccurate information, but none the less, our society is now full of educated patients.
Last fall, Vinod Khosla made the bold statement that technology will automate or replace 80 percent of doctors. He sparked some serious concern amongst physicians everywhere. Is he right? In some sense, he is correct in saying that much of what a doctor does will be automated. Even now, most physicians are scrambling to the nearest device with internet access to look up a drug or disease. Khosla’s theory assumes there can be an even faster way to sense, record, and analyze signs and symptoms. He is likely correct, but that still only accelerates the diagnostic process. However, diagnosis is generally only a portion of the job of a physician.
Wearables are getting some major hype recently, especially since the release of Apple’s HealthKit and with the growing popularity of Fitbit. Eventually, the technology will be widely used by providers to receive medical data from patients, helping to promote disease prevention and to improve treatment compliance. Wearables will allow for more frequent collection — and organization — of accurate and objective medical information.
Despite patient care being the primary focus in healthcare, a lot more than direct medical attention is required for a thorough medical service. This is especially true of organizations that desire to support and improve their surrounding communities. As leaders in the field it’s imperative that providers consider the "non-medical topics" like finance, logistics, administration, and regulation. Less obvious are the environmental implications of providing care, but not insignificant by any means.